1983 ddo 001

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • uglycent
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 1386

    #1

    1983 ddo 001

    Set this one aside mainly for the condition and tone. But started looking and see what looks like MDO but it also looks very similar to an 002 or 010. any input would be some help.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by uglycent; 12-27-2011, 12:29 AM. Reason: Title change
    Even a fool can look wise if he keeps his mouth closed.
  • mustbebob
    Lincoln Cent Variety Expert
    • Jul 2008
    • 12756

    #2
    If I had to choose either 002 or 010, I would say 010. However, I am not sure it is that one either. I am thinking it is maybe 001. This is one that would require examination to be sure.
    Bob Piazza
    Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com

    Comment

    • copperlover

      #3
      I would agree with Bob that this is closer to 01 than any of the two listed above. Very nice find and a great looking coin to boot. Because of the lighter spread on the date which is applicable to this DDO.
      Congrats on your find.

      Lucien
      Last edited by Guest; 12-26-2011, 06:05 PM. Reason: Added because of lighter spread

      Comment

      • uglycent
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 1386

        #4
        Yes I agree with you guys that it is a 001, I went to CC and scoped it along with each photo there. The part that was throwing me off is I believe mine to be a LDS and has lost some of the finer details for comparison. Thanks Anthony
        Even a fool can look wise if he keeps his mouth closed.

        Comment

        • georoxx

          #5
          If I didn't know any better, I'd suggest "illusion doubling". (Typical look of a USB scope image.) The pic of the ear looks like a "hit".

          -George

          Comment

          • liveandievarieties
            TPG & Market Expert
            • Feb 2011
            • 6049

            #6
            I'm leaning towards what George is saying, if it were #1, you'd see it most clearly on IGWT, wouldn't notice it on the date. If #3, doubling on the date would be far different and not clearly on LIBERTY. I don't think it's genuine die doubling.
            [B][FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium][SIZE=2]Chris & Charity Welch- [COLOR=red]LIVEAN[/COLOR][COLOR=black]DIE[/COLOR][COLOR=blue]VARIETIES[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
            [FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium]Purveyors of Modern Treasure [/FONT]

            Comment

            • DoubleYou
              Member
              • Sep 2010
              • 3629

              #7
              Looks like "light-reflection doubling" to me too.
              Wendell Carper
              It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!

              Comment

              • thecentcollector
                Member
                • Mar 2010
                • 1530

                #8
                Those Celestron handhelds are the devil.... I had one when I started out, wound up using a halogen lamp, and tore the LED's out of the scope

                Comment

                • coppercoins
                  Lincoln Cent Variety Expert
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 2482

                  #9
                  Using bi-directional lighting in a scope is totally wrong for coin photos, and this thread shows exactly why. There is no discernible doubling on this coin. What everyone is seeing in the photos is the effect of having two light sources at opposite angles that cause two different parts of the letters to be lit. This causes the illusion of doubling where no doubling actually exists.

                  The macro shot of the coin convinces me that there is no doubling on this coin.
                  Charles D. Daughtrey, NLG, Author, "Looking Through Lincoln Cents"
                  [URL="http://www.coppercoins.com/"]http://www.coppercoins.com[/URL]

                  Comment

                  Working...