Another 1915d Possible 1mm-001?

[Guest]

Here's the other one. I'm less sure of this one. Also, please look between the N and E. Is that a die clash?

Thanks in advance.

[Wheat Cents]

I'll hold off giving you my answer.

Instead... look at the position of the MM in relation to the date. Compare it to the 1915d 1mm-001 on CC.

You will be able to answer your own question.

[DWK]

Its hard for me to tell because the photos are diff sizes.

Is the ratio of the distance from d to 9 vs. d to 1 different between mine and CC's?

[Wheat Cents]

What also makes it rather hard and the fact that your original photo is angled, not square. Makes one want to tip their head and that is always a problem in making a determination of MM position.

Here are the two photos squared up

Draw a line straight down from the left side of the second 1 in 1915.

Are MMs in the same position or is your riding a little more to the right? That would be alot of spread made up because of the wear. Its like a lot of early minor RPMs coin need to be a VF. A G or VG will not cut it.

Also it is a tilt RPM. I do not see any of that. Maybe beacause it is worn down. I cannot make out any reverse diemarkers in your photo. Is it being photoed in a 2x2?

[CCC]

Nice example Wheat. It's more East.

CCC

[DWK]

I see said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw.

(My dad used to say that.) I held up a sraight edge against each photo, and it became obvious. Oh well. By the way, do you see what I see between the N and E?

It looks like a die clash to me but I cant imagine whence it came.